Even though it’s their job to find mistakes in the code, software testers sometimes make mistakes themselves. These mistakes can make QA take longer, cause delays in finishing QA, and then cause delays in handing off to UAT.
Sometimes, these common mistakes can cause problems to be missed, things to be out of place, or interactions to go wrong. We can use what we learn from errors like these on future projects and be less likely to make the same ones again if we take the time to collect and study data about them.
QA in the Making of Software
Code is checked by the people who make software before it is sent to UAT or user acceptance testing. This step is also known as QA, which stands for quality assurance. QA helps programmers find bugs in the code before they send the finished product to be tested.
Most Often Made Mistakes
Here are some of the most common mistakes that people make when trying software testing.
Beginning Without a Plan
A test plan is very important for testing to go well. Beginner testers (or even experienced testers) sometimes think they can just click around and remember what they’ve tested, what they still need to test, and what problems have come up without having a plan. This is a bad idea that will only lead to more problems. Testing should always begin with a planned, predetermined method that can be used again and again.
Not Signing Off on the Testing Plan
Since QA approval is still needed, it can be tempting to skip reviewing and signing off on the test plan. However, if the test data, cases, and scenarios aren’t agreed upon ahead of time, you could end up testing the wrong data and discovering this after the fact. After that, time is gone and can’t be got back. This leads to extra work and longer wait times for handoff to UAT, which hurts the client’s trust and makes future goals less likely to be met.
Not Picking Good Test Data
If you test with too much similar data, you might not find a bug in the code. If, say, a company only tests the annual benefit enrollment configuration in their HRIS for full-time employees, they might not notice that there is a bug in the enrollment event for part-time employees or that the rates table didn’t update for part-time employees whose spouse smokes. To make sure you find and fix problems before sending them to UAT, you should use data from as many groups as possible.
Not Noticing False Positives
Another mistake that many people make is not noticing fake positives or test cases that officially passed (met the criteria to pass) but didn’t work the way they were supposed to. Cases like these should be written down in the issues log and dealt with as issues, even if they “technically” passed QA so that an issue doesn’t get sent to UAT.
Getting Around Manual Testing
A lot more testing is being done automatically these days, which can save time, make things more accurate, and shorten the project calendar. A lot of people think that technology will never fully replace human testing, though. Before getting on WA, there should always be a part of QA that is done by hand to make sure there aren’t any problems that can only be seen by a person.
Throwing Away Test Results
Not keeping test results after they’ve been used is another bad habit. Those test cases and results could be useful in the next round of testing. It is best to keep test data from the last round or two.
Not Doing Testing for Regression
Testing should be done every time a new feature is launched to make sure it hasn’t “broken” anything else. We call this testing for error. It means that you need to test more than just the new feature when it comes out. Software testers who aren’t very experienced often forget to do failure testing, which can cause unexpected problems with features that can stop a business from running.
Tips for Doing Well on Testing
To make it more likely that software testing will go well, think about the following ideas:
- Make a plan before you start.
- Talk to the people who have a stake in the testing plan and get their approval on it before testing starts.
- In your testing plans, write down what you think will happen with each test case.
- Make sure that as many possible situations have been tried by using different test cases.
- Keep detailed records of test cases, results, and problems. Follow problems through to settlement, making sure that someone is in charge of both fixing the problem and retesting to avoid misunderstanding and delays.
- Give as much information as you can, like screenshots, when you report bugs and other problems so that coders can easily fix them without having to recreate the problem.
- To keep the purity that only a human eye can provide, find a mix between automated and manual testing.
- Remember the test answers for a few more tests.
- You should hire a software testing company to do the testing for you. They are pros in this part of project management and know how to do thorough, successful testing.
Hire the Experts at QualityLogic to Do Software Testing
Software companies are hiring software testing, also known as QA, more and more so that their developers can focus on making software. When testing is contracted out, the original company finishes development and then gives the work to the software testing company to finish QA.
Cost savings, better quality, systematic, regular testing methods, and a faster time to market are some of the benefits of this plan. It also lets workers focus on core business tasks instead of QA, so work can be done at the same time. There aren’t any big problems, but there are some things to think about.
Not picking a seller is easy; you have to think about it, evaluate it, and give it a lot of thought. To keep client info safe, data security steps must be in place. It is important to be able to work together remotely, so the right tools must be in place for communicating, working together, and sharing documents. The pros are more important than the cons for most businesses.
To sum up, quality assurance is the process of checking code for bugs before giving it to users for approval. There are many mistakes that people often make when they test software, such as testing without a plan, not signing off on the plan, using too little test data, and more.
To make their testing more accurate and useful, testers can use an approved plan, keep detailed records of problems with screen prints, do more hand testing, and more. Outsourcing software testing to companies like QualityLogic, which focuses on just this part of the project management process, can save agencies time and money while also getting better results. This is quickly becoming the norm in the industry.